Ah Ah! I've got a disk mirror of my win7 that I can go back to the future with (has anybody got a spare De Lorean). Yeah chaps you're right Win 10 sucks. It keeps updating slyly behind your back tries to contact the MS pseudo gods every move you make and grumble moan whinge and whine (oops that me)
going back to win7
New beta version of Bet Angel v1.43.1
You can only make it conditional on the green up if you know exactly what the position is after the "green up".Euler wrote:The best way to overcome that is to make the rule conditional on that.
The green up might be £5 it may be £2.51 or £0.22 or even -£1.50.
A future planned enhancement will be flexible enough to solve this problem and a few others that have been mentioned in the last few months.guy333 wrote:You can only make it conditional on the green up if you know exactly what the position is after the "green up".
Ive created a hsortcut to close the trade (using reverse prices) and assisgned to keypad 0 and has already served me well..
I was wondering if there is any intention to be able to call theses shortcuts from guardian itself as a rule? (Or even if its possible?)
Thanks
Regards
Peter
I was wondering if there is any intention to be able to call theses shortcuts from guardian itself as a rule? (Or even if its possible?)
Thanks
Regards
Peter
We wouldn't link a rule into the shortcuts directly, as a lot of them rely on the context of knowing where the mouse is (current market/selection/bet etc). However if the shortcut gives access to something in the Bet Angel infrastructure that Automation does not, then we could look to add it to Automation also.
The close trade at a reverse price shortcut that you mention would generally be seen as a manual activity, because it lessens the chances of actually achieving the price (balanced against the increase profit in doing so); it requires monitoring/decision/intervention to ensure the trade closure. Not ideally suited to Automation where most customers expect Close Trade to just do what it says on the tin (with the highest chance of success), but I can see it would be useful if you are happy to handle the additional risk.
The close trade at a reverse price shortcut that you mention would generally be seen as a manual activity, because it lessens the chances of actually achieving the price (balanced against the increase profit in doing so); it requires monitoring/decision/intervention to ensure the trade closure. Not ideally suited to Automation where most customers expect Close Trade to just do what it says on the tin (with the highest chance of success), but I can see it would be useful if you are happy to handle the additional risk.
Hi
Thanks for the reply.
Might be worthwhile putting in the back burner for now then?
I thought of it as an interim solution (as there may be a "close trade using reverse pricing" in guardian in the future (I know there are only so many hours in a day and you guys cant implement every request made in the suggestions thread, everthing has to be prioritised)
Just off the top of my head; i cant think of any other shortcuts called from guardian that would be of use?)
Anyway, thanks again
regards
Peter
PS been running this version for a few days now; rock solid as always
Thanks for the reply.
Might be worthwhile putting in the back burner for now then?
I thought of it as an interim solution (as there may be a "close trade using reverse pricing" in guardian in the future (I know there are only so many hours in a day and you guys cant implement every request made in the suggestions thread, everthing has to be prioritised)
Just off the top of my head; i cant think of any other shortcuts called from guardian that would be of use?)
Anyway, thanks again
regards
Peter
PS been running this version for a few days now; rock solid as always
+1 from me on this onephil wrote:The volume and percentage in the ladder is handy addition but do we really need the pound sign and the brackets. With my setup if the volume goes over the 100,000 I already lose the last bracket,to remove these would leave a much cleaner look, we dont have £ signs in the stake boxes and anyone not sure what currency it is can see from the total matched line above. Thanks
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:19 pm
"race distance condition" how to correct use this option? Thank you
Its as it says on the tin, if you select
"Race Distance Condition"
Greater than
7F
then that rule type will only trigger on races over that distance
If you select
"Race Distance Condition"
equal to
16F
Then that rule type will only trigger on races that are 2miles (16F)
"Race Distance Condition"
Greater than
7F
then that rule type will only trigger on races over that distance
If you select
"Race Distance Condition"
equal to
16F
Then that rule type will only trigger on races that are 2miles (16F)
would it be possible to have a few additions to keyboard shotcuts such as:
--load settings an profiles
--move mouse cursor to... same as <Display>. That would be handy with multiple monitor setups.
--reorder selections by volume
we have the ability to <change preset stake on the ladder> but a simple select preset stake nr.. would be useful too.
Why can't we assign something to <shift> key alone?
--load settings an profiles
--move mouse cursor to... same as <Display>. That would be handy with multiple monitor setups.
--reorder selections by volume
we have the ability to <change preset stake on the ladder> but a simple select preset stake nr.. would be useful too.
Why can't we assign something to <shift> key alone?
Thanks for those ideas, we'll see what we can do. Not sure whether it's possible to push the mouse cursor around the screen based on a keypress though.
The shift key is only considered a 'modifier' to another key rather than a separate key itself. I would imagine it could be quite dangerous to intercept normal Windows behaviour. e.g. Attempt to type a capital letter into something and the Shift shortcut would trigger!gutuami wrote:Why can't we assign something to <shift> key alone?